Is the US preparing a preventive nuclear attack against China?|Blog |teleSUR

2022-07-31 21:24:22 By : Mr. EJ Marketing

You are reporting this comment to the newsroomYou must complete all required fields in order to continue.Your message has been sent successfully.The Kissinger Doctrine advocated the implementation of the G-2 (USA and China) as world arbiters.Thus, in an article published by the New York Times, entitled "The occasion for a new world order", Kissinger already considers China a great power (felow superpower), advises against protectionism or treating China as an enemy (which would come to make her a true enemy).Likewise, it calls for relations between the United States and China to be raised to a new level on the basis of the concept of common destiny, (following the model of the transatlantic relationship after the Second World War), with which we would witness the enthronement of the Pacific Route (America-Asia) as the first world commercial axis to the detriment of the Atlantic Route (America-Europe).However, the unequivocal objective of the Pentagon would be the confrontation with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), founded in 2001 by the Shanghai Five (China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan) plus Uzbekistan and converted together with the countries of the ALBA and Iran in the hard core of the resistance to the world hegemony of the United States and Great Britain.Zbigniew Brzezinski, author of the book “The Great World Board.American supremacy and its geostrategic imperatives” (1997), considered the geostrategic Bible of the White House as well as the bedside book of successive generations of geostrategists and political scientists, would have recorded the beginning of the decline of the US Empire, affirming in a lecture at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) that "the post-Cold War dominance of the United States that determined the international agenda is over and cannot be restored in the lifetime of the next generation," adding that "None of the world powers can achieve world hegemony under current conditions, so the United States must better choose the conflicts in which it is going to participate since the consequences of a mistake could be devastating."Likewise, in an article published in the magazine Foreign Affair (1970), he exposes his vision of the "New World Order" by stating that "a new and bolder vision is necessary with the creation of a community of developed countries that can try to effectively the broad problems of humanity”, sketches of a theory that will outline in his book “Between two ages: The role of the United States in the technotronic age” (1971), where he explains that “the era of rebalancing power has arrived world, power that must pass into the hands of a new global political order based on a trilateral economic link between Japan, Europe and the United States”, a doctrine that would imply the submission of Russia and China.The wear and tear suffered by Biden after the Afghanistan fiasco, runaway inflation and the entry into recession of the economy could lead to the Republican triumph in the 2022 midterm elections that would anticipate a triumphant return of Trump in the 2024 Presidential elections, so Joe Biden would urgently need a war to recover his popularity ratings and be re-elected President in 2024, so a preemptive nuclear attack by the US using Trident II missiles against vital Russian and Chinese targets would not be ruled out, which would mean the declaration of the Third World War.The Ukrainian conflict would have staged the return of the Cold War between Russia and the US (Cold War 2.0), the reactivation of the nuclear race and a possible reissue of the Missile Crisis that would have Kaliningrad as its epicenter.In this context, the possible integration of Sweden and Finland into the military structures of NATO and the increase in military forces with 4 new battalions deployed on the European border with Russia and in the event that Sweden and Finland enter NATO and close the access of the aforementioned Soviet enclave to the Baltic Sea Russia would install in Kaliningrad the Iskander-M missiles equipped with multipurpose warheads as well as S-400 anti-aircraft missiles with which, in the words of political scientist Vladimir Abramov, "the province of Kaliningrad will once again play the role of a gun in the temple of Europe as it was two decades ago", the reissue of the Missile Crisis cannot be ruled out.On the other hand, we are witnessing some surprising statements by the former British Foreign Minister, Philip Hammond, reported by the newspaper "The Telegraph" in which he states that "London could host US nuclear missiles on British soil amid tensions with Russia", what could be understood as a return to an arms race like the one maintained during the Cold War with the USSR (reviving the Partnership project between the US and Europe to provide the UK with Polaris missiles from July 1962).Thus, according to The Guardian, Johnson would intend to expand his nuclear arsenal from the current 180 warheads to 260, which would imply the rupture of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).On the other hand, the strategic agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States known as AUKUS would symbolize a change in the world geopolitical cartography by displacing the Atlantic scenario for the Indo-Pacific as the epicenter of the geopolitical pulse between the United States and China with the aim of establishing a arc of nuclear crisis around China that would cover from Indian Kashmir to Japan, passing through South Korea and the Philippines and closing the arc with New Zealand and Australia to dissuade China from its adventure to dominate the China Sea and achieve its subsequent subjugation .Thus, the US would have planned a nuclear program with a duration of thirty years and a cost of one Billion $ that would include a new hypersonic missile as well as a system designed to detect cruise missiles in US territory (JLENS) and would be preparing a preventive nuclear attack. of the US using Trident II missiles against vital Chinese targets using Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan as an excuse.Login or Register to be able to comment, use the forum and more

on="tap:top.scrollTo(duration=200)" class="scrollToTop">Top